Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi,
my SPSS-file consists of rows and columns (obviously). every row is a subject and every column is a variable. my subjects can be divided in 2 groups. i have 3 variables that belong to a "region" such that my table looks like: region1_var1 region1_var2 region1_var3 region2_var1 region2_var2 ...etc. subject1 subject2 subject3 . . . etc. i thus have a between-subjects factor: group and (i think) 1 within-subjects factor: region. i would like to do a test that tests whether there is an effect of region for my 2 groups. this test -if significant- may allow me to 'post-hoc'-assess the regions separately. can this be done using the Repeated Measures analysis under the General Linear Model? thanks, -joost ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Joost,
It may be just how you named your variables and my assumption that 'subjects' are persons but I'm having difficulty understanding how you have a repeated measures design. I don't understand what is repeated. Is var1, var2 and var3 the repeated element within a region or is region1, region2, etc the repeated element for var1. Perhaps somebody else understands this better than I do. Gene Maguin -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of joost Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:29 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: question Hi, my SPSS-file consists of rows and columns (obviously). every row is a subject and every column is a variable. my subjects can be divided in 2 groups. i have 3 variables that belong to a "region" such that my table looks like: region1_var1 region1_var2 region1_var3 region2_var1 region2_var2 ...etc. subject1 subject2 subject3 . . . etc. i thus have a between-subjects factor: group and (i think) 1 within-subjects factor: region. i would like to do a test that tests whether there is an effect of region for my 2 groups. this test -if significant- may allow me to 'post-hoc'-assess the regions separately. can this be done using the Repeated Measures analysis under the General Linear Model? thanks, -joost ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Administrator
|
Typically my brain processes region as living location. Region as a within subject variable therefore is an alien concept. I contend that Joost needs to better explain what his/her data are if anyone is likely to be of help aside from making ESPeculations!
... [show rest of quote]
Please reply to the list and not to my personal email.
Those desiring my consulting or training services please feel free to email me. --- "Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque mittatis margaritas vestras ante porcos ne forte conculcent eas pedibus suis." Cum es damnatorum possederunt porcos iens ut salire off sanguinum cliff in abyssum?" |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by joost
As I read it, potentially, you have two within factors.
According to your example, for each Region (I think of, Brain-region), you have 3 variables. The number of Regions is not stated. You can have a simple repeated measures for one factor, Regions, if you analyze each variable separately. Post-hoc tests for repeated measures are best performed as paired t-tests; and you make your own adjustments after the test. Certain stat-packages have offered analogs to HST, etc., for post-hocs, but they have tough assumptions. If you know enough to justify using them, you won't be asking here. If the 3 variables are "the same variable in three locations" then you have a doubly-repeated measures, if you want to analyze them together. If the 3 variables are various, then you have MANOVA design. That one will be, most likely, extremely difficult to make good sense of, and it is probably something to avoid. -- Rich Ulrich > Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:29:15 -0400 > From: [hidden email] > Subject: question > To: [hidden email] > > Hi, > > my SPSS-file consists of rows and columns (obviously). every row is a > subject and every column is a variable. my subjects can be divided in 2 > groups. i have 3 variables that belong to a "region" such that my table > looks like: > > region1_var1 region1_var2 region1_var3 region2_var1 region2_var2 ...etc. > subject1 > subject2 > subject3 > . > . > . > etc. > > i thus have a between-subjects factor: group and (i think) 1 within-subjects > factor: region. > > i would like to do a test that tests whether there is an effect of region > for my 2 groups. this test -if significant- may allow me to > 'post-hoc'-assess the regions separately. can this be done using the > Repeated Measures analysis under the General Linear Model? > ... [show rest of quote] [...] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |